CoMLSpaceships

Ginormous Aquarium

aquarium

This is the Kuroshio Sea, an exhibit at the Okinawa Chiraumi Aquarium in Japan.  John Rawlinson shot a few minutes of HD and put it to music.  You really should watch it.  I’m torn between beautiful and sad.  The animals are gorgeous and really well displayed but most of them travel hundreds of miles a week in the wild and though this is a huge tank, it’s still pretty small compared to what these critters are used to.

There are 11 Comments to this article (Write A Comment)

fauna says:
Sep 10 2009

I shared this video with everyone at work. Musta watched it ten times. It’s amazing. And yes, sad too.

David says:
Sep 10 2009

What do you think about the White shark at MBA?

Oliver says:
Sep 10 2009

It’s like the sardine circle room at our aquarium, only bigger.

Cayla says:
Sep 11 2009

I’m not sure if any of the animals in that tank are intended for release. The only animals in the million-gallon tank at MBA that are intended for release are the white shark, the pelagic stingrays (eventually) and the ocean sunfish. The tuna and bonito are just like the animals in that beautiful video Spence put up (thanks! :D ) , in that they also travel several hundred miles in a week. That has never been 100% okay with me, since the tunas also serve as research subjects for metabolism studies and tagging. For conservation purposes, it’s good science. But for the best interest of those individual animals, it’s iffy.

Spence says:
Sep 12 2009

David: I think it’s great that we’re keeping the White Shark for a while. She acts as an ambassador to us monkeys and we learn a LOT from studying her while she’s with us.

Cayla: Totally agree with you. The data we gather is a good, the incarceration bit is tough. One thing to note, however, is that many animals actually live longer in captivity. The question is what’s better, a short, free life or a long, captive one?

Spence says:
Sep 12 2009

Oliver: How did you change your avitar? I can’t even find a place to do it in the Wordpress Admin pages…

Cayla says:
Sep 12 2009

I totally agree with you. The long captive lifespan trend is especially true for many mammals, birds, and small animals in general. There’s also the advantage of captive breeding programs, as well as contact with the public to spark a connection between human and animal specimen, which will hopefully encourage the general public to care about said specimens more. With some animals that are large or hard to keep but need protection in the wild, you’re sort of damned if you keep them in a captive environment, but damned if you don’t have a way of physically presenting them to the public’s attention (for conservation, mainly.). I’m really glad this subject got brought up! :)

Spence says:
Sep 12 2009

Yeah. Conservation and Advocacy are especially difficult topics to address in the scientific community. If a report or finding can be viewed as having an agenda, then critics can point to this and say the science is skewed by the scientists personal beliefs, making the science less valuable. OTOH, if one can display the findings in a way that encourages the viewer to make their own connections, then the data can be both scientifically appropriate and act as a catalyst for advocacy.

Cayla says:
Sep 12 2009

Agreed. Just look at the classic battles for saving marine mammals versus the comparatively lackluster attempts/campaigns to conserve equally (or even more) ecologically crucial animals that aren’t as fuzzy or cute, like most sharks. Ideally, scientists should objectively address the issue that: 1.) A population of , say , a top predator species is in drastic decline, and repercussions from said population loss will affect lower organisms in that food web, ultimately impacting fisheries, chemical processes in the ocean, and large-scale bio-productivity. Next step: 2.) The animal is not warm-blooded, fuzzy, cute, or extremely intelligent. Thus, the public has little or no focus on the issue, simply because there’s no view of that animal as “worthy” of saving. Step 3: Taking more or less the Aquarium’s approach- a wide array of programs dedicated to researching captive and wild specimens of that species, studies of population history and migration, as well as collaboration with similar agencies to assess the real impacts of a worst-case scenario in which the species disappears. What do we think will happen? This should take years, if not decades to understand if it’s done right. Meanwhile, the populations of said species continue to drop from overfishing or even new diseases that the species cannot deal with that were probably introduced from humans. Final steps: The successful compilation of population dynamics and physiological data, as well as population assessments of the species that directly intercact with said declining species. Possible attempts at keeingcaptive specimens and *appropriate* “showcasing” to the public through physical presentation and empowering public interactions that reinforce positive stimulation to avoid businesses or products that threaten the existence of said organism. (seafood watch, for example.) Also, celebrity chefs using sustainable foods, the creation of *good* documentaries, (sharkwater is a good example. It’s an eye-opener.), and someday, legislation for fisheries protection, various collection bans, marine reserves creation, etc. etc.

Meanwhile, when using captive animals as ambassadors for their species, it is crucial to strike that oh-so-delicate balance between getting the public excited about that animal, and coming off like it’s there just to look cool. In other words, the “this animal really matters for the future survival of oceanic food webs, which will definitely impact bio-productivity, fisheries, our economies, and our atmosphere” versus ” Well! That’s a badass fish you’ve got there… Um, hey, do you guys also have any dolphin shows, by chance? We came all this way… We’re looking for some real entertainment, you know?”

Oh dear God that was a long comment. I think some people get banned for stuff like this….

Spence says:
Sep 12 2009

Cayla: You are rocktacular. Totally agree with that whole massive response.

That is all.

Oliver says:
Sep 14 2009

It’s called a “gravitar” in WP for some reason. You should be able to change it in the main panel somewhere… I’ll go check.

Write a Comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Shortcuts & Links

Search


Latest Posts